john allan wrote: > Well, > > The different between a 1.2 GHz and 1.4 GHz is only 16 % which is *just* > enough to notice a little difference. *However*, the speed of the machine is > not entirely dependent on the speed on the processor. You've got bus, hard > drive and RAM speed in there making - or not making in this case - a > difference too. > > So I'd expect a clean 10% increase which is about the minimum that might > notice a speed difference. General user experience, e.g. Windows and apps > opening would feel a little snappier, it would make an old 1.2 GHz feel like > brand new again. You left out one additional plus for the 1.4Ghz processor, it has twice the L2 cache (512k vs 256k). I don't know how much additional performance that provides, but I'll wager it's not insignificant. -- J.C. Webber III Technical Lead, Unix System Administrator jcw at kingoblio.com (home) www.kingoblio.com Please, if you use Windows, do not add my address to your Address Book. I do not wish to be spammed or have my email address hijacked by a virus and used for fraudulent purposes. Thank you.