Perhaps it is (I've never compared MP3 player pricing), but even so, shouldn't the best cost the most? :) Eagle On Nov 14, 2003, at 22:07, Bill Fox wrote: > The iPod, as the most expensive MP3 player, is certainly not a > commodity, far from it. > > On Nov 14, 2003, at 5:06 PM, Benjamin Ing wrote: >>> Apple has stated that it will not be in the commodity market. Of >>> course, minds could change. >> >> If Jobs is looking to build on the iPod's success, he could build a >> media server that could hook up to a composite input on the TV and >> your stereo input. Imagine using a Keyspan remote to order iTunes >> music off your TV set to be played through your stereo. >> >> If that were the case, it would HAVE to be a commodity, just like the >> iPod.