On Tuesday, September 16, 2003, at 05:48 PM, John T. Folden wrote: > These are actually OS X files and I doubt OS X would be running if > they were misnamed. The main reason for being puzzled... OS X is running fine on the machine-reboots into 9 as well, classic works fine. Dumb thought tho don't suppose these are emulation files for classic (thus the OS 9 name in parenthesis)? This happened once before (different machine)-don't recall if (OS 9) was visible. Fixed by deleting 10.1.something and giving X a second chance a couple of months later. The updates are what kills ya' Rod