On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:14:41 -0400, Ken Johnson <kr-johnson at comcast.net> wrote: > I have a new (to me) Titanium powerbook, that came formatted UFS. The > Cube, and my G4-933 are both formatted EFS+. I'm contemplating > re-formatting the Powerbook, but I wonder what the differences are - > speed, stability, etc before doing anything. There is an article on > the Apple site, but it's for 10.2.8 and earlier - I'm running 10.3.4. > > Ken Johnson I would stick to HFS+ (case insensitive). I wonder why your PB is formatted UFS. I know from Server lists that it is rarely used on OSXServer except when a certain application needs it. UFS is known to be slower so even Apple recommends HFS+ (Extended, Journaled) in almost all situations. And in this case, for a PB, it is almost certainly the way to go. e