<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<br><div><div>On 28 Jun, 2007, at 6:37 PM, Ricky Mondello wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Palatino; font-size: 14px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; ">I have, on authority, that Leopard will not install on a 450 or 500 mhz PowerMac G4 Cube. However, the install disc will let the user still use the Utilities menu (startup disc, disc utility, etc.).<br>--------<br>Don't ask for my source.</span></blockquote><br></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div>I just love it when someone imparts "truthful, yet confidential", information and then says "Don't quote me on that."<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>If a source cannot be verified, then what credence can we give to the information or the person delivering the information? I would rather not be teased with morsels that cannot be digested completely, thank you.</div></body></html>