>I've had the pleasure of using both, and I'll echo what others have >already said: >- both are nice small machines, but the 2300 is more easily toted >around town (it's thinner and just a bit lighter) Actually the 2300 is actually heavier. It's a tiny bit thinner. It does seem quite a bit smaller though. >- if you want something that resembles a more modern (ie, current) >computer experience, the 2400 is the choice as it trumps the 2300 in >processor, memory, video, HD, and ports. >- the 2300 seems more 'vintage', however, if you are just doing >basic tasks (eg, email, word processing, etc) then it is fine (ie >typing a document in MS Word is relatively the same whether you are >on a SE/30 or a G3) Keep in mind that ethernet on a 2300 is both expensive and a pain, or sometimes a combination of the two. Andrew -- Fade far away, dissolve, and quite forget What thou among the leaves hast never known, The weariness, the fever and the fret Here, where men sit and hear each other groan; - John Keats: "Ode To A Nightingale"