> I have seen a couple of these generation Powerbooks where the screen > quality was washed out and blue cast, nothing to write home about. I > wanted to know if the 2400 suffered from these problems as well. The 2400's screen has pretty good contrast, bright and not at all washed out. At "thousands of colors" it has much better contrast than any of the colour Duos (whose screens lose contrast and become visibly darker at the higher depth). It is fairly bluish as LCD screens go. On mine I used the Adobe Gamma control panel to lower the apparent white point to about 7500K (starting from the PB2400c profile supplied with the OS) with good results - window borders went back to being neutral grey instead of blue tinted. The definitions of "blue" and "white" vary greatly depending on the observer and setting, though. > 2400c display: 10.4" 16-bit 800x600 color dual-scan or active matrix There aren't actually any dual-scan 2400 Powerbooks (or Duos - the passive greyscale ones are single-scan). I think the 1400 came with the choices above, in a slightly larger screen (the dual-scan one was actually pretty nice, though probably with reduced actual colour depth - less of those ambiguous "thousands" to play with ;). -- Marc Sira | toh at victoria.tc.ca If you can't play with words, what good are they?