Marc Sira wrote: >If you're running File Sharing on OS 9 and find the performance increase >unspectacular (due to the issues I mentioned before), consider using >something >other than Personal File Sharing. One fairly easy choice is to run a Hotline >server on one machine and the client on the other. There are other choices >too >(an FTP server, a web server) but Hotline is fast and easy to set up, and the >client and server software can be downloaded free from the web. You can also >try Personal Web Sharing if you like, but I've found the performance pretty >poor. Finally it should be quite possible to set up one of the newer >peer-to-peer filesharing apps so each machine could see the other (Mactella, >for instance), but it might also require a little work. > >Whatever you choose, it will work using the same impromptu IP network you >configured earlier. Good suggestion, and since I'm running a box with several services of this very type I figured this to be good op to see how fast they are. I usually choose TB2 to quickly move big files to and from the server. Over my 10/100 LAN from my household server* I get these numbers. Strangely, _sometimes_ I get 3 MB/s from Timbuktu but I have yet to figure out why only _sometimes_. I get similar speeds to 10BT-only clients (except for the 3MB/s-TB2 thing of course.) * 9500/200/96ram/OS 9.1 free speed Carracho 730KB/S <http://www.carracho.com> Mac only, requires OS9 or X shareware Hotline v1.23 720KB/S This has clients available for many platforms and OSes I use an old version, but latest at: <http://www.bigredh.com> for more info on HL and Carracho, and to find HL and C. servers on the net: <http://www.tracker-tracker.com/> not free Timbuktu (TCP/IP) 1MB/S AppleShareIP 6.33 680KB/s I'll toss in another set of not-necessarily-related data here. I found an interesting speed difference among clients/servers when testing speeds of WiFi vs. wired: same server/LAN, SMC WiFi AP Timbuktu (TCP/IP) Carracho w s a w s a PB500PPC 350 250 NA 290 300 NA PB3400 1024 250 NA 325 350 NA Pismo 1024 250 250 425 560 460 w = cat5 wire s = Orinoco Silver a = AirPort built-in TB2's speeds varied dramatically between wire and WiFI, where Carracho's speeds did not. TB2 is _much_ faster over the wire on the two modern PBs than Carracho, but Carracho kicks TB2's butt wirelessly. Maybe it was just a quirk of _my_ setup, I'll try some other tests another time. Dan K my public servers, all are welcome to stop by... (sorry, nothing naughty, just lots of Mac tech info): <carracho://bobabooey.dhs.org:9700> <hotline://bobabooey.dhs.org:9500>