on 2/19/03 12:59 PM, Nicole at kludgrrl at sympatico.ca wrote: >> From what I understand, most of the benefit in 9.2.x is either for recent >> hardware or Classic, so I don't think there's much point. I can't think >> of any software offhand that requires it versus 9.1. > > Actually iTunes 2 requires it, and the iPod requires iTunes 2. Nope. I've got iTunes 2 playing right now on my iMac running 9.1. You *do* require the newer set of Disc Burner components, but that's available as a separate d/l. I don't have the URL handy, but I bet if you check VersionTracker you'll find it. - Eric. -- Eric Strobel (fyzycyst at NOSPAM^mailaps.org) ===================================================================== *I'd* rather wear fur than go naked! =====================================================================