[Duo2400] Re: We can close this list now! ;-)

[Marcelus G. Zalotti]

on 1/7/03 19:04, Larry Friedman at larry.s.f at mindspring.com wrote:

> Fair enough, if the 2400 is strictly your productivity machine the new
> PB makes perfect sense (if you have 1800 lying around). However I got
> the 2400 because it was an inexpensive way to run a bunch of old
> software. The new PB still will not do that, hell the new PB will not
> boot into 9 either so you have to run X.

But is this non-9 booting info written anywhere on new Powerbook's specs?


> Apple did one of the things I wanted, but I honestly thought they were going
> to do an iBook with the Ti chassis. Not a G4 which is more expensive. So if
> you need t run a 9 environment as well as an X environment the iBooks are
> still your best option.

For me the original round and colorful iBooks was the most beatufiful
Portable Mac of all the time (I would put the 520/540 series in 2nd
place)...



-- 
Marcelus.
site <http://magiozal.blogspot.com/>