[Duo2400] Re: We can close this list now! ;-)

[Andrew W. Hill]

>on 1/7/03 19:04, Larry Friedman at larry.s.f at mindspring.com wrote:
>
>>  Fair enough, if the 2400 is strictly your productivity machine the new
>>  PB makes perfect sense (if you have 1800 lying around). However I got
>>  the 2400 because it was an inexpensive way to run a bunch of old
>>  software. The new PB still will not do that, hell the new PB will not
>>  boot into 9 either so you have to run X.
>
>But is this non-9 booting info written anywhere on new Powerbook's specs?

Just like the non-7.5.5 booting info is written into the 2400's spec...

Aqua