on 1/14/03 10:59 AM, Larry Friedman at larry.s.f at mindspring.com wrote: > I'm relatively new to this list so you're more than welcome to take a > "who do you think you are stance" ;-). What happens when someone say > can't we include the 15" and 17" Powerbooks because they are so similar > to the 12". Its a tough line to cross, or we can just say that the > machine has to be able to boot into 9. LOL. The whole point of the "subcompact Mac" list is that the distinguishing factor is the fact that *our* Macs have (pretty closely) the dimensions of an 8.5x11" piece of paper. (Actually, by that criterion, perhaps we'd welcome those few out there still using the PB100??) The 14" iBook, and all the 'greater than 12"' Powerbooks wouldn't make that cut. - Eric. -- Eric Strobel (fyzycyst at NOSPAM^mailaps.org) ===================================================================== There is never a single right solution. There are always multiple wrong ones, though. =====================================================================