if you ignore meaningless numbers, and focus instead upon release dates, the OS 7-8 timeline really falls quite close to the os X timeline in regards to paid releases. (maybe apple just wants to keep os X around for a long while, thus they use all the 10.* combinations they can.... Oct 1991 7.0 paid Oct 1992 7.1 paid Sept 1994 7.5 paid Jan 1997 7.6 paid July 1997 8.0 paid Oct 1998 8.5 paid Oct 1999 9.0 paid Mar 2001 10.0 paid (public beta) Oct 2001 10.1 paid (many consider first "real" os x) Aug 2002 10.2 paid June 2003 10.3 paid looks to me like apple has stayed pretty consistent in regards to paid updates, other than changing their numbering system.... sandor On Dec 24, 2003, at 1:03 PM, CMS wrote: > We should not have to buy, there stupid updates, and bug fixes, until > > e.g. Version ## > 10.00 okay buy, > 10.2 buy > 10.5 buy > 10.7 buy > 11.00 Buy > > because, > if we buy, > 10.00 > 10.1 > 10.2 > 10.3 > 10.4 > 10.5 > 10.6 > 10.7 > 10.8 > 10.9 > 11.00 > Paying allot more than usually. ( Just skip a few upgrades... 10.3 to > 10.6 ) > Man that alot compare to those days, in OS 9 > > 7.0 > 7.5 > 7.6 > 8.0 > > > Regards- > Rick