On Saturday, December 27, 2003, at 08:03 PM, zhmmy harper wrote: > > On Friday, December 26, 2003, at 01:51 PM, Frank Haddock wrote: > >> I've just upgraded my system software from 9.0 to 9.2.1 and now >> serious >> problems are occurring. >> > > Not to be a killjoy but I think you have made a bad mistake. > 9.2 is made to work in conjunction with a mixed OSX OS9 system . > I could not even install it on my G3 older system. > Back down to 9.0 and then do 9.1. 9.1 will stabilize you. > YMMV > Jim > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Yo! > > I seldom say anything on the List but this time I felt compelled to do > so. > > I had a lot of problems with 9.0. I switched to 9.0.4 which was more > stable, then 9.1 which was even better. Then I felt I had to have the > very latest so switched to 9.2.1, which was included in my OSX 10.1 > box. 10.1 was terrible and I quickly used it as a Frisbee but 9.2.1 > worked great! Then I thought I had to have 9.2.2 and that was a total > disaster even with 10.2.8. I went back to 9.2.1 which I use both as a > Carbon partner for 10.2.8 on a partition AND as my main OS for all the > drives and cpu's I use for the majority of my graphics work. > > In my judgement OS 9.2.1 is by far the most solid performer Apple has > ever produced. I use it on the following cpu's with not one problem: > G4; G3; 8500, 9600 and 6500. > > Maybe the particular CD that came with 10.1 is just superior? I don't > know. thta is the one I have. > > Jano > I put the 9.2 CD in my 9600 with a G3 and it would not install it. Now I have a G4 in there maybe I should try it again. J