I've got a sawtooth 450MP that had the same ATI 128 AGP card. I run OS X [almost] exclusively. I saw on ebay a nvidia ge4mx(?) (64mb), the same card that's in my QuickSilver 1gb MP, and went for it. It worked like a champ... overall computer was xbenched @ 20% faster - just with the video card. The worst part was a couple of weeks later, OWC had/has a comparable nvidia ge3 agp card for $65 or $75 bucks! That's quite a bit less than what I paid on ebay for the bigger brother. Anyway, go for the video card, you will see an improvement. BTW, I'm also running 2, 17" displays without a speed hit. It's awesome for PhotoShop and the like. Good luck! In a message dated 7/29/2003 7:39:48 AM Eastern Daylight Time, John Erdman <jperdman at earthlink.net> writes: >My G4/400 Sawtooth still has the original ATI Rage 128 video card in >the video slot. In some games such as "Medal Of Honor" , certain of the >fast graphics intensive sequences, are very "draggy". For the most part >the rest of the game plays fine even with the graphics options "turned >up to max". Even when I make adjustments on the video options screen >to reduce the load on the card the system drags in the fast sequences. > > > Now I know that the Aspyr recommends the G4/450 as the minimum >required configuration, but so far my old soldier has been quite >adequate for it. > > Two questions: > >My question is: would installing an ATI 8500 make any improvement over >the the stock card for gaming, or am I being limited by the main CPU >processor clock? How can I determine which is limiting? > >If I choose to upgrade to a GeForce4Titanium will it operate in my 2X >AGP slot. The tech spec are a little above my heat but I've an idea >thaat the 2X card may not have enough power feed for the card. Is that >right? > >Thanks, >John -- J. R. Rosen Armadillo Press-Printing & Graphics 305 Wells Fargo Dr., Suite 4 Houston, Texas 77090 281-586-9383 (office) 281-586-9876 (fax) dilloman at aol.com dilloman at sbcglobal.net www.armadillo-press.com