[G4] Which PowerMac
Brian Conner
brianconner at vision-video.com
Thu Jun 19 07:27:42 PDT 2003
I don't usually like to see or make "me too" posts, but in this case, I'm
compelled to. Joe has summed this up perfectly.
Nice post, Joe.
Brian Conner
-----Original Message-----
From: Power Macintosh G4 List [mailto:G4 at lists.themacintoshguy.com] On
Behalf Of Joseph B. Gurman
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Power Macintosh G4 List
Subject: Re: [G4] Which PowerMac
If past history and the rumor mill are any indication, the first
generation 970's will be:
1. only incrementally faster than the current generation of G4's as
long as they run a 32-bit OS (Jaguar),
2. unable to take advantage of the 64-bit architecture of the 970,
unless Panther is released well before the autumn target date,
3. unable to take advantage of the possible speed boost from 64-bit
until 64-bit-savvy applications are available (hence Apple's manic
drive to get developers to the WWDC), and
4. pretty sad compared with the _following_ generation of machines.
The best rule of thumb for buying new <any kind of computer> is,
what do you need _now_? If you need more
speed/bandwidth/storage/whatever now, buy now. If it can wait for n*
6 months, there will be a new generation of machines out every 6
months.
Diatribes about faster internal communication, better use of DDR
memory bandwidth, 8X AGP slots, PCI-X, and other features that won't
affect real work flow significantly can be directed to /dev/null.
Joe Gurman
More information about the G4
mailing list