SIIG and acard and sonnet are all the same (all use the same acard chipset) i have a SIIG branded ata-133 non-raid card with 2 120GB WD SE 8MB cache drives, they work wonderfully, and i get great speeds off of them (used for DV). the great thing about the SIIG (not sure about the sonnet) is that i can use either SIIG or acard firmware updates, both work equally well. the toughest thing about the card/install was trying to route 2 more ide cables through the inside of my quicksilver case... peace sandor On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 05:28 AM, csean at poc.it wrote: >> i LOVE my sonnet tempo 133 card.... it's light years ahead of the >> onboard >> ide, (and it allows me to not worry about my b&w g3's (now g4/550) ide >> issues. it took my 200G harddisk without a blink. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> Subject: Re: [G4] G4 533Mhz Tower and a 200 GB hard drive - not ! >> >> >> Thanks to everyone for the help, >> So it looks like I need a PCI ATA/133 card - anyone got any >> suggestions as >> to which one? >> >> Thanks >> Tony. > > > I'm also thinking of getting an ATA/133 card for my G4 Sawtooth, as > I'd like to install 2 x Western Digital 8MB cache drives (1 x 80GB, 1 > x 40GB) on separate buses (busses?), and leave the original 20GB on > the computer bus as the startup disk. Got a good price on the drives, > so why not... > > Anyway, I think I remember reading that most of the ATA/133 cards were > made by the same manufacturer, then rebadged as Sonnet, SIIG, etc. > Might have been a Macworld article, and IIRC, Macworld concluded that > as the cards were essentially the same, the only differences were > Warranty, Documentation and maybe extras, like cables. They concluded > that the SIIG was the best deal, as it had a 5-year warranty. Nice. > I also noticed at OWC <www.macsales.com> that the SIIG ATA/133 is a > relatively bargain priced $79. Double nice. > > Anyone have anything good or bad to say about the SIIG ATA/133 card? > > Any known problems with: 1) XLR8 G4/550 upgrade, 2) Nvidia Geforce4 MX > video card, 3) OS 9.x or 10.1.5? > > Thanks, > > Chris >