On Saturday, November 8, 2003, at 10:34 AM, Joseph B. Gurman wrote: > > I beg to differ.... and I have both machines sitting on my desk at > work. > > If you do anything that requires moving substantial amounts of > data from memory to the CPU (the original poster mentioned DV and > MPEG2 content and DVD burning, but games, image editing, &c. all > apply), you will notice an impressive difference. We often create 1024 > x 1024 animations of sequences of images from a spaceborne telescope. > They run 50% faster on the 1.8 GHz G5 than on the dual 1.25 MDD G4. > (Interestingly, it turns out that for that particular application, > memory bandwidth is the only determinant of speed: the animations run > as fast on the 1.8 as the do on a dual 2.0 GHz G5.) > > Who doesn't use lots of memory bandwidth these days? Someone who > never burns CD-R's or watches DVD's, edits images or video, plays > graphics-intensive games, downloads QT movies from the Web and plays > them.... but just uses their machine for text processing, browsing > very simple Web pages, and e-mail. In other words, people for whom the > dual G4 was overkill. > > One other area in which the G5's excel: disk bandwidth. Coupled > with the memory bandwidth, data transfers to/from disk on the serial > ATA drives are amazing (I was getting 55 MByte/s, sustained, yesterday > while reading and writing a 1.7 Gbyte animation file under 10.3.) Yes, > you can't put four hard drives in a G5.... but you can put in half a > Terabyte of disk space on two serial ATA drives. Once again, if your > demands on a machine are light, neither dual G4 nor G5 is really > needed. > > Joe Gurman > -- > "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they go by." > - Douglas > Adams, 1952 - 2001 > > Joseph B. Gurman, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics > Branch, Greenbelt MD 20771 USA > > Really great real-world observations. I wish I had stayed in high school so that I could get such a cool job. Do you post these animations? Jim