Sandor Ferenczy wrote: >*sigh* > >1) non of this software was optimized for the dual 2 gHz G5 > >2) we have no idea how the processor slewing*** was set in the control >panel, therefore it should probably be assumed that it was at the >default, which is "automatic" and that setting has already been shown >to produce far lower benchmark numbers than the fastest/highest setting. > >***slewing --> >http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Hardware/Developer_Notes/ >Macintosh_CPUs-G5/PowerMacG5/1Introduction/chapter_2_section_4.html I would give BareFeats a break on (2), since the G5 hardware developer note states that slewing is achieved "by a gradual transition that does not impact system or application performance..." A similar statement was made by the G5 product manager in the WWDC G5 G5 architecture presentation; he said it was done to keep the fans barely turning when machines were idling, or you were just reading mail, but shouldn't be visible in performance. (1) I suspect is correct, and in many applications, will be improved considerably when Panther is a 64-bit OS and the applications developers have had time to implement 64-bit addressing. Unfortunately, my guess is that's probably at least a year away. In the meantime, there are certainly tweaks that can be made, and hopefully, developers will follow Adobe's lead and do so soon. (Note that the Photoshop results for the dual 2 GHz G5 were obtained before the G5 plug-in was available, so I bet the dual 2.0 beats the Xeon 2.4 in the "MP-aware" Photoshop test when they re-run it.) -- "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they go by." - Douglas Adams, 1952 - 2001 Joseph B. Gurman, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Branch, Greenbelt MD 20771 USA