On Feb 8, 2004, at 11:48 AM, Jonathan Armstrong wrote: > > On Feb 8, 2004, at 10:04 AM, sr ferenczy wrote: > >>> Does the VT cluster run Mac OS X -- and is it really relevant to our >>> issue? >>> >>> f >> >> yes it does, and yes, i believe it is highly relevant. it is the >> largest working example of SMP we have on the macintosh, and i >> believe it shows how well the OS handles SMP. > > The VT cluster is not an SMP machine, and OS X isn't directly > responsible for it's process scheduling. > > It is a relevant case for parallelism in general, and the Apple > hardware has some advantageous properties that are being exploited in > this system, but in this case the OS has less to do with performance > than you might think. > > ---------- > G4ist, a listserv for discussion of everything G4. > FAQ at <http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/G4.html>. > Send a message to <G4-DIGEST at themacintoshguy.com> to switch to the > digest. > > XRouter | Share your DSL or cable modem between multiple computers! > Dr. Bott | Now $139.99 <http://www.drbott.com/prod/xrouter.html> > > Dr. Bott LLC 4-port USB Hub in translucent Graphite! > Dr. Bott LLC <http://www.drbott.com/prod/ghub.html> > > Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Canon Digital > Cameras | > --Quicksilver & refurbished G4's arriving daily! | and Camcorders!! > | > > MacResQ Specials: LaCie SCSI CDR From $99! PowerBook 3400/200 Only > $879! Norton AntiVirus 6 Only $19! We Stock PARTS! > <http://www.macresq.com> > > OS X News, Dr.Mac, Forums, Tutorials, Tips, Hints, FAQ?s - > http://www.osxfaq.com >