On Jun 9, 2004, at 9:59 AM, Steven wrote: >> > > I thinks so. In a car engine the cylinders are part of one block that > has to be cooled. I'm not sure if the cooling fluid passes the > cylinders one after the other (in a series) instead of passing the > cylinders in parallel at the same time. I would say the latter would > be possible and preferable. I'd surprise me if it were not done that > way. it simply cannot pass them all at the same time, engine orientation prevents this. take my four cylinder vw for example, coolant flows in through one end of the straight four, and out at the other end -the last cylinder HAS to be getting coolant that has already been heat soaked by the first 3 cylinders in line in the series. a mass "parallel" (if even possible) setup would take way too much plumbing, and would probably end up being far to inefficient in day to day working. > > Anyway the comparison is not valid i.m.h.o. The processors are two > separate units whereas the engine is one block. > > Steven why wouldnt the comparison be valid? basically, the point is just to show that coolant, while getting very hot, still has the capability to dissipate heat from an even hotter surface, whether it be a microchip or an engine. very obviously, highly skilled engineers have set both systems up, and would not let one end of the loop get "much hotter" than the other end. im sure, just like in all other liquid cooled applications, both the beginning of the series and the end of the series are within operating specs. sandor > sr ferenczy wrote: > >> On Jun 9, 2004, at 9:16 AM, Steven wrote: >>> sr ferenczy wrote: >>> >>>> http://www.apple.com/powermac/design.html >>> >>> It seems to me that if I read the diagram correctly one of the >>> processors will be much hotter than the other... >> >> no more so than in a radiator-cooled car engine, where the coolant >> flows in a continuos loop past the first cylinder before the last....