Alex wrote: > > On Sunday, Jun 27, 2004, at 01:35 Canada/Eastern, Anne Keller-Smith wrote: > >> [...] Since I want to archive several years of email, I need to be >> able to save whole threads as single .rtf files. > > > I don't know, maybe it's an issue of text encoding; however, if you want > to archive e-mail, RTF is not a good choice. Save as Raw Message Source; > it's a much better option. > > <0x0192> When I opt to "Save As" an email message, it offers me a suffix of "text," "html" or ".eml." Is .eml your Raw Message Source? Why is that better than "text?" keith whaley