On Oct 24, 2004, at 9:41 PM, Mel Krewall wrote: > Hal, > In spite of what the model numbers indicate, the 8500 is a more > capable card than the 9000 when you compare the specifications. Why > did ATI replace the 8500 with the 9000? Who knows. But if I were > choosing, I'd take the 8500. > Mel > Would 64 Mb 8500 be superior to a 128 Mb 9000 though? I am thinking in terms of gaming and DVD watching. Thanks, Kevin Why not vote for John Kerry? Here's a reason. http://mysite.verizon.net/res19rmg/