[G4] OSX and OS 9

[Wilkin, Wayne (Mass)]

My 2¢. I used to have a 733 that always was able to boot into 9, until I
upgraded it to Panter. After that you could select OS9 as a startup, but it
would not boot into it. But it would boot into a OS9 utility disk that I had
lying around. Then I came across some more systems of similiar types (733's,
and lower), that had Panther on them, with OS9, but they also would not boot
into 9. Couldn't figure it out, so I just finally gave up and said ok if a
computer has Panther with 9 forget it, don't even try to boot into 9.

Then I came across an interesting article on Microsoft's website (sorry
don't have the link), that stated the version of 9 that you would install
with Panther is actually a Virtual Operating System. To me I compared that
to something like Virtual PC. You can run it, but can't boot into it. It
would really explain why these computers at one time could boot into 9 but
no more.

> ----------
> From: 	Snow White
> Reply To: 	A place to discuss Apple's G4 computers.
> Sent: 	Sunday, October 24, 2004 7:21 PM
> To: 	g4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> Subject: 	[G4] OSX and OS 9
> 
> My 2¢.  I keep OS9 and OSX on separate partitions on my cube and on 
> separate hard drives on the desktop.  It has saved my ass ets many 
> times as OSX collapsed with dubious RAM or other unforgivable abuses.
> 
> But I am amending my outlook here - I use separate hard drives for OSX 
> 10.3 and 10.2 with 9 on a partition.  The reasoning is simple - my 
> computer will not boot OS9 so to be useful as a boot drive it must be 
> some flavour of OSX.
> 
> I believe heavily in keeping it all separate.  I never need to 
> re-install any more than one OS at a time and it does not effect 
> anything with the other OS es.  Seems to me this 10 minute precaution 
> at the very begining has saved me hours of re-install time.
> 
> jj
> 
> 
> On 24-Oct-04, at 5:31 PM, g4-request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com 
> wrote:
> 
> > OSX and OS 9
> > To: rramsowr at sbcglobal.net, "A place to discuss Apple's G4 computers."
> > 	<g4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com>
> > Message-ID: <p0620041ebda1c1cd5cba@[204.255.236.59]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
> >
> > The citation from "The Missing Manual: OS 10.3" can't be argued with.
> > I question  though, how much time and effort should be spent
> > accomodating OS9 as a separate operating system when clearly it is
> > only around to keep applications alive which have not made the move
> > to OSX. I agree with David. The second drive will be much more useful
> > as a backup or scratch disk for applications which use them.
> >
> > DaleH
> >
> >> Carol is on the right path in here thinking.
> >>
> >> The following is taken from "The Missing Manual"
> >> (10.3) Appendix "A" Installing Mac OS 10.3 ..pages 672
> >> & 673.
> >>
> >> The Partitioning Question...
> >> In the coming months and years, you'll save yourself a
> >> lot of trouble and time if you keep mac OS 9 and Max
> >> OS X on two different drives. this kind of setup
> >> offers serveral advantages:
> >>
> >>    * It's much easier to switch between the two
> >> operating
> >>      systems at startup time. (You may hear this
> >> feature called
> >>      dual booting.)
> >>
> >>    * Troubleshooting Mac OS 9 or Mac X is much easier.
> _______________________________________________
> G4 mailing list
> G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4
> 
>