On 04/29/05, Alex <lists at lexial.ca> wrote: > On Apr 29, 2005, at 12:51, John Baltutis wrote: > >> [...] Select the Upgrade Mac OS X option. >> I found that this is better than using Archive & Install or Erase & Install >> because it integrates your current OS X version, including everything >> previously installed by 3rd-party apps, updating all system components, >> including user accounts, their home folders, and existing network >> settings; whereas, A&I preserves the user accounts and network settings, but >> removes all other system files, including those installed by 3rd-party apps >> outside Applications and Users, to a Previous System folder.[...] > > As I recall, when upgrading from Jaguar to Panther, either option > retained a number of settings much better discarded. See MacFixIt's take on upgrade vs A&I. From my experience, the upgrade option is the least taxing; however, you might have to uninstall some 3rd-party haxies if they break anything. Speed Download, Bwana, Fruit Menu, and Windowshade were problematic during the testing, but the developers have issued compliant updates. > For instance, the shell preference was retained, rather then being >replaced with the > Panther default (bash). Does the Tiger install do the same thing? I don't remember what transpired upgrading from Jaguar to Panther. However, since I used bash in Panther and the default shell for Tiger remains bash, I didn't experience any change. Note that Apple has added the Korn Shell to its installed shells.