So who is correct? In order to connect my Rev B iMac running 9.2 and my G4 iMac running OS X, I have to have Appletalk active on both. According to John, it can be done, but according to Doug it can't! At 12:24 PM -0700 8/16/05, John Baltutis wrote: >On 08/16/05, "Dennis B. Swaney" <romad at nvwisp.com> wrote: >> >> At 9:03 AM -0400 8/16/05, Dale Hoffman wrote: >>>What is AppleTalk good for anymore? >> >> Well, in my case, it is the only way that I can connect my Rev B iMac >> running 9.x to my G4 iMac running 10.3.9. So that means I've reached >> the end of my OS X updating since 10.4.x does not support AppleTalk. > >Where did you get that idea? SysPrefs->Network->Built-in >Ethernet->AppleTalk (activate or disable, as desired). > At 2:02 PM -0600 8/16/05, Doug McNutt wrote: >At 09:03 -0400 8/16/05, Dale Hoffman wrote: >>What is AppleTalk good for anymore? >>Is there any advantage to activating it on a network consisting of >>OSX machines? > >I believe AppleTalk is still present in 10.4 for the purpose of >connecting to printers. > >Some repairs were made between 10.4.0 and 10.4.1 to support some >connectivity with peecees. > >You cannot connect to any Mac with AppleTalk over Ethernet with any >version of 10.4. Steve has willed it that way and it's the reason I >remain at 10.3.9 and am busy learning Linux. > >Consider FTP over Ethernet for moving files to and from orphaned >Macs. With OS neXt and its propensity for ignoring resource forks >and HFS metadata (type and creator) in favor of filename extensions >you'll not lose much. -- Sincerely, Dennis B. Swaney "Windows is a command-line OS with a GUI shell while Mac System 10 is ... oh, never mind."