Tony Johansen wrote: > On 10/2/2005 4:35 PM, "Robert Hazelrigg" <robzilla at earthlink.net> wrote: > > >>I'm thinking of upgrading my G4 APG 400. I like the Sonnet chips >>myself. no jumpers or noisy fans. >> >>The question I have is does anyone how much better the 1.2ghz processor >>is over the 1ghz processor. I'm just wondering if 0.2 ghz is worth the >>extra $100. >> >>Thank You, >>Ralph122163 > I wouldn't think that the difference could possibly noticed in any ordinary > situations. If it were me I'd spend the 100 bucks on extra RAM instead Unless that extra $100 is really precious, hard to make up, I'd go with the slower speed. By the time you get up to the Ghz range, an additional 20% is not going to be noticeable. If you had those two machines side by side, it would be hard to tell which was the faster. And, I guarantee any speed difference you think you perceive, will go away within a couple of weeks. You'll be so used to the faster of the two, you'll wonder why you thought it was all that fast! A very fast processsor rapidly becomes "normal" and you always wish it were just a touch faster! Ever since my 8 Mhz processor, a long time ago, I've absorbed every speed increase in the newer processors in a very short period of time... I'd go with Tony's advise...spend the $100 on RAM. One can never have too much...and RAM is easier to install than a processsor chip... keith whaley