I'm thinking that this used to be true in the pre-gigabyte days when the heads actually rested on the disk. Once the disk spun to speed the heads would fly over the surface, but while the disk was spinning up or spinning down they would drag on the surface (which was lubricated to reduce wear). The number of start/stop cycles figures into the disk drive MTBF equation. However, now that drives use dynamic head loading (heads loaded after disk is spinning) there is no longer head to disk contact and start/stops are less of a concern than they once were. I'm only talking about the mechanics, not the electronics of the drive. > Let's just say that the act of spinning up a harddrive is more > stressful > (to the drive) than days worth of running. (Yes, that applies to "put > drive to sleep when idle" too. It may save you energy, but not > necessarily > money. :-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text/enriched Size: 951 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/g4/attachments/20050608/ddc97ff3/attachment.bin