On 12/10/2005 10:28 AM, "Tim Collier" <collierof1957 at mac.com> wrote: > I hate when people post at the bottom of the message, it means I > actually have to scroll down to read it Tim I was at the centre of a long running debate earlier in the year over this issue. I was a top poster, and I was amazed at the passionate and often angry arguments from both sides. What it boiled down to in the end was that there is a tradition handed down from ancient times (read anything more than 5 years ago) that tech mails are bottom posted. There is logic there in that when answering a message with several contributions the story flows naturally down the page and it is easier therefore for busy respondents to skim the problem and contribute. There is a better reason for bottom posting however, and that is when people give their time freely and often answer dozens of questions daily across several lists, they are justified in simply skipping poorly formatted or impolite messages. The etiquette of tech messages (by long standing convention) is to bottom post, to strip out html, and generally delete the irrelevant. I am not criticising your wonderfully full and generous response in this thread, just thought you might appreciate knowing why the bottom posting occurs. It's a small enough matter to follow the convention if it makes it easier for someone, so I do myself these days. All the best, Tony. http://www.tonyjohansen.com A Life In Art