Hey, Nate, I'm no expert on anything, but I've long had a similar problem with my 533DP, running 10.3.9... I have two 512MB PC133 DIMMs that I bought specifically because they were CL2, but System Profiler has never, ever recognised them for what they are. It has consistently reported one as CL3 and the other as PC100! I have no idea why this is, as I am either very certain they are premium RAM, or at least I have convinced myself they are. They both say PC133, at least... At any rate, I have heard that this is a rather common issue with Sys Pro, so I generally don't worry about it. I am interested in finding out how your upgrade situation resolves, though, as I am leaning strongly towards one of the 1.8DP upgrades from Sonnet or Giga (weird: they now look the same), as I can't afford a completely new machine and even if I could, kind of want to save my resources for whatever is available when or if CS3 ships... Unless used G5's drop in price by about a thousand dollars between now and then, of course. NAK On 18 Aug 2006, at 13:53, g4-request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a fussy computer (Quicksilver 2002 800 MHz originally, upgraded > processor to Sonnet 1.8GHz dual). I get a lot of freezes, usually > while on the Internet or in the e-mail app on the Internet. I ran > disk repair from another startup disk (fixed a lot of stuff) and > disabled Classic, but still get the ocasional freeze--it fact i was > kicked out twice while writing this. > > I thought the problem might be because the System profiler reads the > RAM at PC100. It's OWC RAM, probably about 2 years old. I didn't > look at the chip, just figured maybe I bought cheap RAM to years ago > and settled for PC100. I called OWC Tech support and asked if that > might cause a problem and they said it might, so I ordered 3 more PC > 133 512MB chips, thinking I might sell the PC-100 to old iMac owners. > > The chips came, I installed them and checked the profiler. It still > read that the chips were PC-100! I looked at the labels on the chips > I removed, and they, too, were PC 133. > > What's up with that? Any ideas? OWC tech support is next on my list > of calls. I don't need 5 chips for three slots. > > Nate