Tony wrote: >At risk of sounding a bit rude, anything that depends on a floppy drive is >so old that you might consider that you have gotten your moneys worth out of >it many times over, and perhaps it is time to upgrade to a more recent >version that is made for a modern operating system. > >The problem with older programs is that each OS upgrade incrementally makes >more and more changes away from that which a particular program is made for. >When you install a program the backwards compatibility is stated, but since >the future is unknowable a future OS compatibility is not stated. However >eventually there will be a limit. You may well have reached that point >despite 'classic'. FWIW I still use a lot of Classic programs on my G4 (OS 9.2.2/OS X 10.3.9) and have yet to find a major one which doesn't work. That includes Excel, a 14 year old accounting program, and more importantly, Photoshop 5. In that respect I think Apple have done a pretty reasonable job on backward compatibility, tho' this won't be the case with the new Intel machines which won't run Classic at all. So sorry, I can't help with the Excel problem. Mine (in Office 2001) works fine. > >As someone who came along after the introduction of OS X I have never really >understood the holding on to OS 9 programs that occurs. So far as I can tell >OS 9 is a limited and unpleasant to use system better avoided where >possible. Still familiarity is important, and I can understand that sadness >that comes when for instance an old pair of shoes has to be thrown out. > >It usually takes a little while, but usually you reach a point where you >wondered why it took so long to make the change. I take the point, but I've never changed simply for change's sake. Apart from anything else I have two OS 9 Macs hooked up via Ethernet to the OS X G4 (a Pismo Powerbook G3 and a beige G3, both of which work fine, and will print over a shared USB network). The reason for retaining the old beige Mac is simply that I have a lot of good SCSI hardware hooked up to it (two scanners and a disk burner) which I'm loath to junk simply because the G4 doesn't support it. As exchanging files between networked Macs is a breeze, I might as well go with what I've got. BTW I certainly wouldn't categorise OS 9 as 'unpleasant'. A bit clunky maybe compared with OS X, but I've been using Macs since Multifinder was a big innovation! Best Alex -- Alex & Carmel Hurst Waterfall Near Cork Ireland Tel: +353 21 454 3328 Mobile: +353 87 245 7048 Work: +353 21 427 0907 email: corkflor at iol.ie Home Pages: http://www.iol.ie/~corkflor