On 3-Feb-06, at 4:22 AM, g4-request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com wrote: > G4 upgrade questions > > I have a MDD dual 867 Mac, and find myself trying to make the next > best step. > I bought the dual 867 because I like the looks of the case and > GigaDesigns > had a dual 1.4Ghz upgrade card at the time. They quit selling them not > long > after I got the MDD. I'm considering trading up my mom's 7600/200 > (that I gave > her) to my MDD and getting an older G4 and getting a dual 1.8Ghz from > Sonnet/PowerLogix/GigaDesign. I want the fastest machine that will > boot into OS 9. So, I > have a few questions for you G4 wizards. > 1-Has anyone run an early model MDD with a GigsDesigns dual opgrade > card? > Runs ok or problems? > 2-Outside of the looks of the case, are there any > advantages/disadvantages > between the AGP/Gigabit Ethernet/Digital Audio/Quicksilver models? Any > reason > not to get the last Quicksilver? To those of you who have done the > dual 1.8 Ghz > upgrade on any of the G4's, have you had problems or not? The last MDD to run OS9 was a 1.25 Ghz dual firewire 400 (not 800). This is the speed you refer to in Q 4 below. > 3-Has anyone tried to put a MDD front face on a Quicksilver? If all the slots you need line up this should be possible - but why would you want to? > 4-Has anyone tried putting a faster MDD card (like the factory 1.25Ghz > or > 1.42 Ghz from a faster MDD) into the dual 867 with good results? Can > it even be > done? I do not believe this is possible and once above 1.25 there is no chance of running OS9. > 5- Does anyone know the last model that will run OS 8.6? I had to boot > up my > 6100 just so I could use ClarisCAD. My MDD won't boot into 8.6 and > ClarisCAD > won't run in 9.2.2. 8.6 could run on a G3. It will not run on a G4 as far as I know. But a response to your query says it is possible to run your program. >> "<skenn at earthlink.net> >> Subject: Re: [G4] G4 upgrade questions >> >> I have been running ClarisCad on my G4 dual 1.25 firewire 400 in >> Classic mode, OS X 10.3.9. There are one or two tricks but it runs >> fine. So far the best replacement I have been able to test seems to >> be RealCad. It is quite close in function and interface to CCad with >> a few improvements. >> >> Contact me off line if you desire more info about this. >> >> Skid Kennedy" > > STeve