I just setup a 20" iMac Intel I could not tell the any difference when it was running rosetta from the I apps it was very fast . I now used two of them and I was needing to buy anther mac to replace my G4 AGP I would get one Michael & Sharon Vogt <>< On Mar 7, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Al Poulin wrote: > On Mar 7, 2006, at 4:54 PM, g4- > request at listserver.themacintoshguy.com wrote: > >> Message: 5 >> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 05:28:46 +1100 >> From: Tony Johansen <tjoh7019 at bigpond.net.au> >> Subject: Re: [G4] Panther or Tiger? > >> Anne, your original question regarded Tiger or Panther. Intel is >> another >> matter. Be aware that Intel will not run any OS 9 programs at all. >> OS X on a >> G4 or G5 has 'Classic' mode, not so Intel Macs. Initial reports >> seem to >> indicate that OS X non Intel (non 'universal') will run on Intel >> but despite >> Steve Jobs claims that they work normally, it appears they are >> very slow as >> with Windows programs in Virtual PC. > > The latest Macworld magazine has a review of the Intel iMac. The > speed hit for running non-universal applications, using Rosetta > software translation, depends on what older machine is being > compared, what older machine you are leaving behind. > > Three functions tested in MP3 Encode, Photoshop Suite, and MS Word > Scroll ran in roughly one half to one third the time on the iMac > G5/2.1GHz and in about two thirds to three quarters the time in the > eMac G4/1.42GHz. But the iMac Dual Core machines ran the tests in > two thirds to three quarters the time required in the iMac > G4/700MHz, the slowest model with the half-basketball base. > > So I'm guessing that the iMac Dual Core using Rosetta for old OS X > applications is roughly equivalent to the performance of the single > CPU Quicksilver 2002 models at 800 and 933MHz. > > Al Poulin > Anger, hate, and revenge are for the devil, forgiveness is for God, > proactive self-defense is for the rest of us.