On Mar 23, 2006, at 4:14 PM, James Asherman wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2006, at 4:02 PM, GDB-MDD-X.4.5 wrote: > >> >> On Mar 23, 2006, at 3:18 PM, James Asherman wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mar 23, 2006, at 2:42 PM, GDB-MDD-X.4.5 wrote: >>> >>>> The video compression is set to MPEG-4 with 50% Codec quality >>>> at a 320x240 resolution. > > Always looks bad on a TV. > >>>> (Note: I have thought about trying the 640x320 resolution, but >>>> from what I've read the VHS quality is not enhanced that much >>> >>> >>> You have a lot of good ideas. The foregoing is not one of them. >>> Jim >> >> I'm here to learn as much as anyone else Jim, please explain. >> > > Mpeg4 at 50% quality at 320x240 just has to be significantly worse > resolution than your VHS tapes. > It's less pixels than were there to begin with and 50% quality of > a highly compressed codec. > Watching those DVD's on a big TV should be a pretty murky experience. > While I would use a .dv codec,what is more importat is that I think > shrinking your res and limiting quality are parameters that would > IMHO make it > a waste to commit such material to DVD. > Jim Well okay, now we're getting somewhere! I'll give that a shot and report back. Will be awhile though as I'm still waiting on the movie that is still processing. Thanks Jim. Just a message from Doug...