With a Mini, what you will get is a Mac which surfs the internet five times as fast, but runs Photoshop at half the speed. The Mini is super for someone who lives in iLife/iWork, but won¹t cut it with demanding professional programs. Users of professional programs are in a bind for the next year, as we wait for genuinely intel-studly applications to appear. Remember that applications under Rosetta require about three times the RAM as on a PPC Mac, and you will see that even maxed out, a Mini won¹t cut it for industrial use. Remember, too, that maxing out the RAM will cost you a lot. If you want more than you already have, on a budget, bottom-feeder G5s are selling regularly on eBay for under $800. I would not recommend using firewire/USB drives for other than occasional use; they are not suitable for running several hours a day, and because of the interface are far slower than internal drives. On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:27:55 -0500, Richard Northouse <rnorthouse at wi.rr.com> wrote: > I have a Quicksilver (G4, OSX.Tiger, 3 drives -- > 80g, 180g and 120g, 1gig ram, > Superdrive, 17" apple display, 733mHz clock). I have > been thinking about getting a processor upgrade to maybe > 1.6-1.8 gHz. But today a friend was telling me about > his mini-mac duo. It has a 80 g drive, 512 meg of ram, a > Superdrive, with a 1.83 gHz clock. The list price is > $599 (or maybe 699 - I might have forgot). > But this little baby is about the price of the processor > upgrade - plus I get the ability to run Windoz. I can > probably put my second and third drives on a firewire > box. I can also up the memory to a gig or two. My Apple > display and keyboard will plug into the new box. > I do a lot of Microsoft Office (word, excel, > powerpoint), some Photoshop, and internet stuff. > So what is the best deal -- upgrade or minimac? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/pipermail/g4/attachments/20060921/fd073fef/attachment.html