1. Didn't understand ARMD - did I miss a post? 2. Thought something that worked for us might help someone else. 3. Wrong list for eye problems. 4. In future, I'll keep my thoughts to myself and stick to the listed topic regardless of what others are doing. apologies to anyone insulted. Dan On Saturday, September 29, 2007, at 08:10 PM, Crandon David wrote: > I took a look at this site. While there is some useful and correct > information on it, most of it is pure crap. I'm ashamed that a fellow > optometrist actually is advocating this junk. Especially the stuff on > glaucoma. They are just trying to sell their junk and make money. > Working on a computer is about as likely to cause glaucoma as hair > growing on your palms if you masturbate. > > David > > > On Sep 29, 2007, at 1:59 PM, C D Tellier wrote: > >> My wife has problems with dry eye and we found some products and >> exercises on this web site that have been very useful. You might >> want to check it out. >> >> http://www.visionworksusa.com/ >> >> Dan >> >> On Saturday, September 29, 2007, at 04:02 PM, keith_w wrote: >> >>> Crandon David wrote: >>>> Hi Keith, >>>> Good reply. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple dumps the shiny >>>> screens on the next update for them. Apple is usually about >>>> ergonomics, but they messed this one up. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> Regarding your ARMD, make sure you are always wearing UV protection >>>> and taking your vitamins. One regular multi and one antioxidant >>>> supplement "eye" vitamin a day. >>> >>> I currently take (1) 20 mg Lutein capsule and two B&L I-Cap pills >>> each day of the week. >>> I never leave the house without my cap (360° bill) and UV protection >>> sunglasses. >>> >>>> Also, there are now some medical treatments for dry ARMD, have you >>>> looked into this? >>> >>> I wasn't aware there was anything one *could* do about the dry >>> version, so the answer is 'Nosir, I haven't.' >>> >>>> David >>> >>> Of course, I'd appreciate any heads-up you could give me. >>> The email address that accompanies this message is correct. >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> G4 mailing list >>> G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com >>> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4 >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> G4 mailing list >> G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com >> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4 > > _______________________________________________ > G4 mailing list > G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com > http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4 >