[G4] Ancient Tech? (great link...)

[Robert H. Baucom]

Car older than your G4?  I just sold my 1991 Ford F150 Supercab last  
August. Now's I gots a 2006 F150 Supercab.
And do I love it. Can't hardly believe all the improvements and it  
only took them 15 years.
But ... my wife's still driving her immaculate, low mileage 2000  
Mercury Gran Marquis.
I'd have kept the' 91 F150, but at 105,000 miles and driving back and  
forth from Arlington, Texas to Borrego Calif
every winter in an 18 year old vehicle ... I'm getting too old to   
have car trouble in the middle of the desert.
That would greatly inconvenience "Scooter", my traveling cat .

I just bought a 733DA to replace my Fort Worth Location 533 DA  
'puter. It popped the processor during an
OS 10.4 upgrade ??? For $120 delivered it was the cheaper and less  
trouble some route.
I've got 2002 Quicksilvers in Arlington and Calif.

RHB

On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Jonathan I. Nori wrote:

>  .::BUMP::.
>
> Just because I really don't want to see a thread this entertaining die
> off.
>
> By computer standards, G4s may be ancient technology, but that's no
> reason to toss otherwise useful hardware. I mean, at the very least my
> old DP450 Digital Audio could double as an anchor for my rowboat. :)
>
> How many people here own a car older that their G4? Show of hands?
>
> *grin*
>
> I just bought another G4 off eBay just for some low-end video editing.
> Couldn't beat the price.
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>>>> gifutiger at gmail.com 02/22/09 9:57 PM >>>
> Greetings ( + )!( + )
>
> Since I really don't understand what your trying to make of this
> Subject: Ancient Tech?
> And since it doesn't seem that you want to take it off- line I've  
> place
>
> the Subject: Ancient Tech? into my mail "Rules" to DELETE, do not pass
>
> go all eMails immediately that contain the Subject: Ancient Tech so go
>
> ahead send 10,000 eMail about Ancient as I won't see any more of them.
>
> I really don't understand if your "BRAGGING" or "COMPLAINING" but I am
>
> sure that there are others in this group that want you to stop and
> since you haven't gotten the word I've fixed it for me.
>
> Best regards,
>
>    -  Harry -
> ø?ºº?ø,̧̧,ø?ºº?ø,̧̧,ø?ºº?ø,̧̧,ø?º?ø
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2009, at 5:57 PM, keith_w wrote:
>
>> Eric Wood wrote:
>>> Am 22.02.2009 um 18:22 schrieb cwick:
>>>> no acronym's? wtf...
>>> No acronyms and no freaking apostrophes in plural forms. Let's
>>> review the basics -  we add an "s" to most noun phrases to mark them
>
>>> as plural and we add apostrophe- s ('s) to a noun phrase to denote
>
>>> ownership. One exception to this, however, is "its" and "it's."
>>> "It's" is a contraction of "it is," while "its" represents
>>> ownership. Because pronouns have separate forms for the plural
>>> (really just one: they), there will be no confusion of the meaning
>
>>> of "its."
>>> So for the sake of my sanity, please stop copying the typographical/
>
>>> orthographical errors of others. Rise above it!
>>> Eric W.
>>
>> Hear, hear, Mr. Wood!
>> Thanks a lot! It's good to hear it explained correctly.
>>
>> keith whaley
>> _______________________________________________
>> G4 mailing list
>> G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
>> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4
>
> _______________________________________________
> G4 mailing list
> G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4
>
> _______________________________________________
> G4 mailing list
> G4 at listserver.themacintoshguy.com
> http://listserver.themacintoshguy.com/mailman/listinfo/g4