J.M.P.Hissel wrote: > On 29-06-2010 02:20, Don Clark, donzclark at rocketmail.com, wrote: > >> You need to get a G5 Dual Quad , HeeHee > > Don't do that! Avoid the G5's!! Go to an IntelMac or a Hackintosh. I think the Intel Macs are problematic simply because of Apple's product offering. I suppose that the new iMacs have sufficient specs, but if you're like me you won't go for an integrated cpu / monitor combination. And the iMacs, like the mini, are too restricted in terms of expansion. The Mac Pro is overkill power-wise and overpriced for what you get. For whatever reasons, Apple has moved away from the mid-range desktop product that they used to excel at. I finally stopped waiting for an Intel system that would fill the functions of my PM G4 and built a hackintosh. But having done that I wouldn't necessarily advise others to go that route, especially if you want to use your system for real, productive work. As a hobby project it's fine, but unless you're pretty aware of what you're doing and prepared to deal with the vagaries of boot loaders, kexts, and third-party drivers, as well as prepared to have every OS X update be a potential adventure, you should be wary of the hackintosh. I guess this is a long-winded way of saying that the G4s and G5s may still be the best alternatives for many tasks. Eric S.