On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Ken Schneider wrote: > My G5 is about to arrive! I ordered it with a 250GB drive. I will > probably pick up another SATA drive soon for the second internal drive. I did exactly that. FWIW, I was going to run a mirrored RAID environment; I was very disappointed in the RAID capability built into Panther. Basically you can only create a single large volume on the mirrored devices - my experience had led me to expect the mirroring to take place at a block level, that would be volume-independent. I hope they improve this in Tiger, but haven't seen anything about it. > Does anyone partition their hard drive any more? I used to with OS 9. > I was wondering, since I have such a large drive, if I should > partition it. I didn't think OS X really needed or liked partitioning. Just "having a large drive" isn't really a good reason to partition. If you want or need partitions, you should have your reasons clearly in mind. Saying OS X "likes" or "needs" partitioning is not very constructive - it simply supports it. I do use multiple partitions, one for the OS, one for my programs, one for data, and one UFS partition for my USENET feed. I was getting extremely poor performance from my news server software (leafnode) under HFS+/RAID - it improved by a factor of 9 under UFS/non-RAID (no idea which variable was the cause, but the HFS+ partitions didn't show much performance difference RAID/non-RAID). KeS