Danny, good food for thought. I've noticed that no one on this list has really advocated being a slide scanner. But whatever, good luck with the domestic situation... David On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 06:39 PM, Danny Grizzle wrote: > Sounds like my logic 5 years ago. BTW - I still owe on the credit card, > though I've probably paid for the scanner and auto feeder 3 times, the > auto > feeder does not work reliably unattended (there goes any potential time > savings), I've never found time to scan my slide collection & > negatives, > I've bought more hard disks than existed worldwide in 1990, and now > that I > know what is involved, I could never hope to recoup my investment by > taking > on side jobs. Not worth my time, much less overhead. In fact, I've got > teenagers who could use work, but it is not worth the overhead in > training > them... I can't imagine them so much as learning to do a professional > level > CD label, much less becoming a trained Photoshop dust spotter and color > corrector, performing resolution resampling, making JPEGs, cataloging > images, etc. > > To make things worse, my &^%#$@#!@^%&* unemployed brother-in-law has > taken > up residence in my office for the past month scanning his deceased > grandfather's slides. A total waste, poor quality results, running up > and > down the hall 3 times every hour, calling my cell phone whenever I'm > away... > unending tech support. Now that he is used to being around, and > considering > himself an expert (fools never have a clue of their own limitations), > he is > probing me about getting on the payroll. Actually, I think he is > spending > all day sucking up Internet bandwidth in chat rooms with Russian > women, or > imitators thereof. > > Moral: be careful what you wish for. I'd trade places with you, if I > could > have all my money back. > > Danny Grizzle >