[MacDV] Re: PageMaker vs. InDesign
Richard Brown
richard at go2rba.com
Sat Nov 23 21:06:37 PST 2002
After using Quark Xpress since inception, and in that no serious design
house or ad agency has ever used PageMaker for design work (the ratio
between Quark and PageMaker is at least 40:1 in the publishing world), I
can say that, under OS X, InDesign has converted our agency from Quark
in less than a week. We have had PageMaker since its inception as well,
but only use it when an alien file shows up from someone using
PageMaker. This is only once every two or three years... We have retired
all our Quark workstations and use InDesign exclusively, and will not
look back as Quark has made the gravest of errors in not committing to
OS X to compete with InDesign. Earlier versions of InDesign did not
impress us much, but the latest software rocks, especially on OS X,
which is inherently press oriented with built in PDF capability. The
ability to freely design as if you were in Photoshop inside of InDesign
is a huge eye opener. Tremendous power at the touch of the mouse making
complex designs at least 200-300% more efficient - which is to say, the
work is done sooner... Going to press ready PDF also eliminates all
bottlenecks at the press end of things. That is all thanks to OS X.
Richard Brown
More information about the MacDV
mailing list