[MacDV] Avid Xpress DV 3.5 vs. FCP3
Richard Brown
richard at go2rba.com
Wed Nov 27 07:39:34 PST 2002
After looking at the ascent of Avid for the last decade, I personally
could not recommend its product line, as it appears both stalled and
stagnant, and far too smug in its increasingly faltering dominance in
the NLE market. Premiere is a hobbyist at best solution, not to be
considered with Final Cut or Avid in terms of usability.
Final Cut is definitely the way to go. Even today, Final Cut is
replacing Avid systems at the broadcast level, being chosen instead of
Avid on new installations at the broadcast level, and making its first
inroads into supplanting Avid at the feature film level. The beauty of
the system is that you do not have to be a feature filmmaker or a
broadcast television producer to be able to afford the system. This is
not to say Avid Xpress is price prohibitive, but Avid Xpress is a closed
ended solution, not intended to step on the toes of "professional" Avid
systems. Final Cut directly competes not with the whole of the Avid
line. With Avid Xpress, you must "move up" to vastly more expensive
systems if you want more than Xpress can offer. Final Cut places no such
limitation. Just add an uncompressed HD capture card, a RAID array, and,
unlike Avid Xpress, you are doing ONLINE HD post, tens of thousands of
dollars less than any competing Avid solution.
Final Cut is moving aggressively to become the NLE of choice at every
level of production, and finding more creative and empowering means to
get there. My opinion would be the smart bet definitely lies with Final
Cut today. We use it extensively, and find it has replaced the $600 per
hour online suite while offering greater creative flexibility. As Final
Cut goes through a few more upgrades and iterations of hardware support,
I would be increasingly concerned were I an owner of Avid stock.
Richard Brown
More information about the MacDV
mailing list