After looking at the ascent of Avid for the last decade, I personally could not recommend its product line, as it appears both stalled and stagnant, and far too smug in its increasingly faltering dominance in the NLE market. Premiere is a hobbyist at best solution, not to be considered with Final Cut or Avid in terms of usability. Final Cut is definitely the way to go. Even today, Final Cut is replacing Avid systems at the broadcast level, being chosen instead of Avid on new installations at the broadcast level, and making its first inroads into supplanting Avid at the feature film level. The beauty of the system is that you do not have to be a feature filmmaker or a broadcast television producer to be able to afford the system. This is not to say Avid Xpress is price prohibitive, but Avid Xpress is a closed ended solution, not intended to step on the toes of "professional" Avid systems. Final Cut directly competes not with the whole of the Avid line. With Avid Xpress, you must "move up" to vastly more expensive systems if you want more than Xpress can offer. Final Cut places no such limitation. Just add an uncompressed HD capture card, a RAID array, and, unlike Avid Xpress, you are doing ONLINE HD post, tens of thousands of dollars less than any competing Avid solution. Final Cut is moving aggressively to become the NLE of choice at every level of production, and finding more creative and empowering means to get there. My opinion would be the smart bet definitely lies with Final Cut today. We use it extensively, and find it has replaced the $600 per hour online suite while offering greater creative flexibility. As Final Cut goes through a few more upgrades and iterations of hardware support, I would be increasingly concerned were I an owner of Avid stock. Richard Brown