On 4/5/03 5:13 PM, "Daniel Beck" <danielbeck at mac.com> wrote: > > On Sunday, April 6, 2003, at 07:10 AM, Juan M wrote: > >> Many times, the stated 'max' for RAM is based on what was being >> manufactured at the time the PowerBook came out. I know some early >> iMacs could actually have more RAM than the stated 'Max.' > > In the case of the Pismo (which I have), the listed max is half of the > true max. And I think it's for the reason you mentioned above. But some > clever manufactures figured out how to make lower profile chips that > could double the amount of RAM. So my Pismo has 1GB of RAM, despite > Apple's listed 512MB. It also has something to do with the way the RAM is put on the chip -- the banks or whatever... And the old LC IIs had a funky motherboard that only saw 10 MB of RAM no matter how much was in there (12 MB was max though) -- but that hasn't been the case with any machine since... - Mark