On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 12:49 AM, Steven Rogers wrote: > This is absolutely not true, unless the film was shot very poorly. > 8mm film has the capacity to be noticeably better than VHS, > particularly better than re-digitized VHS. > > SR > The only 8mm film I have dealt with are home videos shot 25 + years ago, outside shots over exposed, inside scenes with no lighting resulting in dark clips with little detail. To add to the problem people seemed to shoot very short scenes leaving you with few editing opportunities, I don't know wether this was the result of the cost of film or that it was shot without the expectation of editing. Additionally the deterioration of the film over time results in quality well below VHS quality. I have included 8mm film footage on a DVD made for 50th anniversary and was told that it looked better than the original did, it did seem to have better contrast than the VHS version not having seen the actual 8mm version I can't comment on that but I am sure the projector and screen would have an impact on perceived quality. They had the film transferred to VHS a number of years previously so the choice had been made for me but no-one expressed disappointment with the result. Gerhard Kuhn suspice at hay.net