So Jeremy, are you saying you think it would be worth it to pay the extra $300 (or $240 in my case) for the 9800 because of the open GL stuff it can support at 128 MB vs. the 64 MB 9600? Remember, I will be driving two screens at high res Thanks.. kunga10 (AIM) kunga47 (Yahoo Messenger with Cross-Platform dial-up Video sans audio on Macs) On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 06:14 AM, Jeremy Kezer wrote: >> You think 32 MB per screen is plenty if you are not going to use the >> Mac for games? Or do you think 64 MB per screen is worth the extra >> money? Thanks. > > Depends on what video editing product you are using. If you're using > Avid Adrenaline, Mojo, XpressPro or XpressDV, they have the option of > using OpenGL for real-time effects. The 9800 card has better OGL > support, although the 9600 is no slouch. > > Another consideration is future-proofing your system. OS X also uses > more and more OGL resources, which is one reason why Quartz Extreme > isn't available on older systems with less VRAM.