I would have to completely disagree... For any kind of media work which involves CONSTANT writing, deleting, rewriting to a disk, a dedicated disk or partition will make everything run SOOO much smoother as time goes on -- especially on OS X systems with their 500,000 tiny files for the system and apps. And what's the advantage of doing video capture to a journalled file system? Journalling is nice for regular usage, but slows things down a bit -- if you have a super-fast G4 or a G5, it's probably not a big problem, but I think even Apple recommends against doing video capture to a journalled disk. And what to do you mean by "RAID protection" if you mean RAID 1 (mirrored), this is yet another way to slow down the performance of your hard drives -- the same data has to be written TWICE (once to each disk). RAID 0 is actually the way to go for fast performance, but cuts your data integrity down for each disk you ad to the RAID set (the more disks in a RAID 0 array, the more chance you have of losing data due to a disk failure). If you're working with video and your drive craps out, you just have to re-capture the video (keep copies of the project files on a separate drive if you're worried about drive failure). About organization -- what's wrong with that? If it helps you work better, then do it. Another 2 cents. - Mark On Dec 3, 2003, at 5:07 AM, Peter van der Linden wrote: > Partitions were useful when disks were much smaller, and we needed to > separate out the fixed size stuff from the variable sized stuff. > Nowadays there is much less justification for using multiple > partitions. The right disk technology is one or two partitions, > journalled filesystems, and RAID protection. Anything else is just > organization for its own sake.