If the offending color, such as the grass, maintains a consistency of tone, the Eureka! plugins for Final Cut Pro, including the selective color corrector can work wonders. We used it to change the water in an aerial shot of a bay with an uneven shoreline of dense foliage with excellent results. Additionally, and of course, the Three Color Corrector in Final Cut Pro can quite easily match disparate cameras. Occasionally, however, you will need to do it in stages, using multiple iterations of the Three Color Corrector if the cameras render multiple hues differently (skies vs. skin vs. grass, for example.) One thing to check with different cameras is the Gamma of each, in that different CCD's will vary in that arena as well... Just a note or two... Richard Brown On Dec 16, 2003, at 9:37 AM, R B Williams wrote: > I've noticed the same thing with Sony & Canon. I believe it has to do > with the different > optics in each camera, though it may also have to do with the CCD chip > itself. You can > get around the issue if each camera has white balance that can be set > by the user. > Simply set them both to the same reference white card under the > stadium lights at each > event. > > For footage that is already on tape, pick the one that has the best > color rendition as > your reference. Copy the second reel to another digital recorder (or > camera via AV out's > & in's) through an external color processor. Then capture from that. > > You can probably correct captured footage too in the computer, but > there would be > rendering times to contend with and I don't think the results are > visably different. > > Robert Williams > > riceramblz at mac.com wrote: