On Tuesday, December 30, 2003, at 10:40 PM, Daniel Beck wrote: > > On Dec 31, 2003, at 12:20 PM, James Asherman wrote: > >> On Tuesday, December 30, 2003, at 09:42 PM, Juan Mariscal wrote: >> >>> This must be true of Final Cut Express too, correct????? >> >> Might be , might not be. > > I wasn't sure either, so that's why I wrote "Final Cut" and not FCP or > FCE. > >> Truth is all this logging and looking at the tapes over and over and >> batch capture and logging decisions are a major pain, big loss of >> time and a holdover from the time when 9 gig drives cost 1100$. > > It's not a holdover. It's the norm. Unless you don't do that much > editing. Plus, you don't need to use batch capture to do what I was > suggesting. You can simply use Capture Now. This will require more HD > space while editing, but allows you to dump the media files when > you're done, thus saving hundreds if not thousands in HD costs. > >> With hundreds of gigabytes to spare, do your project and then maybe >> line up the originals of all the clips you actually used and run them >> out to a DV tape. EAsier, quicker, easier on your playback unit. > > Sorry if I sound contentious (not my intent), but this seems more > labor-some to me. I'd just assume let FCP do the "remembering" for me. > Again, how often are you going to need to import from those tapes. Not > very often unless it's footage you use over and over; in which case, > yeah, leave that footage on a HD. > > Again, just a different way of looking at these things, I guess. > Daniel > > > Absolutely. For me, going through three hours of tape and marking it only to have to back up and do the batch capture is a waste of time. Nobody pays me that much and they assume I will get it right the first time. And right, "stock footage" has a folder. And I have 80 gigs empty(third HD) to store hours of footage should I deem it necessary. Save the project file too and bingo, I have still only run the tapes once and the machine didn't take all that (what I think is) abuse. Jim