> Radical difference. DVD-RAM is a dead format but for those of use who > have the drives and a bit of media. iDVD won't recognize it as the > optical it needs to even launch. You can not burn DVD Player discs with > the old DVD-RAM. It's strictly for data and you can add and delete to > it like a hard drive. Let me rephrase: What will the DVD-RAM do that the 105 won't do? (Not vice-versa). For example, I use the DVD-RAM only for backing up weekly, using Retrospect (desktop) for incremental backups. Retrospect keeps adding to a disk until it is full, then continues on the next disk. It's economical, and allows be to go back and grab a file just before it got corrupted. Any reason I can't do that with the 105, using RW disks? I just upgraded to Retrospect 5.0. It claims: > Supports new backup devices, including DVD-R, DVD-RW, and Apple's SuperDrive. So, can I make ongoing, incremental backups with the 105 and RW media, just as on the DVD-RAM? If not, that would be my only reason for keeping the DVD-RAM at all. Tom