On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 03:03 PM, Ric Perrott wrote: > As far as computers are concerned, they don't care one way or the > other. However it is my experience that most Music or Audio CDRs use a > better grade of dye in order to ensure a successful burn. make of this > what you will when deciding if the added cost of these CDRs is worth > it. In many cases it is not and regular data grade CDRs will fit the > bill just fine. I'm not saying your wrong about this, I've heard the same from many places, but it just doesn't make sense to me. If you're talking about consumer/home use a "soft" bit or two on an audio CD is no problem. The same on a data CD can render a file or even entire disk unreadable. For that reason, it just doesn't make sense to me that audio CDs would require a better grade of dye. Am I missing something? As long as we're on the topic (though it may be off-topic for this list) does anyone have any current references on CD blank quality? One factor I'm interested in is how the "generic" blanks of today compare to the "premium" media of 5 years ago. Has the quality been improving steadily and by how much? -Mike